Home » Latest » U.S. » Trump Administration Targets California With Loosened Emissions Standards | NBC Nightly News

Trump Administration Targets California With Loosened Emissions Standards | NBC Nightly News

4

InfoSearched 35 0 U.S.

8.5

SaveSavedRemoved 0

Washington just picked a fight with California over who gets to decide how clean your next car has to be.

On September 18, 2019, President Trump announced his administration is revoking California’s decades-old waiver under the Clean Air Act — the legal mechanism that has let the state set tougher tailpipe emissions and fuel-economy rules than the federal government for years. The EPA says stripping the waiver means one national standard, cheaper cars, and less regulatory patchwork for automakers. California isn’t waiting around; state leaders are already lining up lawyers.

• The Trump administration and EPA argue a single national standard will cut manufacturing costs and make vehicles more affordable and safer.
• Governor Gavin Newsom called the move an assault on clean air that sides with corporate polluters, and Attorney General Xavier Becerra said the state is ready to fight the revocation in court.
• Thirteen other states plus Washington, D.C. — together representing more than a third of the U.S. auto market — follow California’s stricter standards and now have their policies thrown into question too.

The Waiver at the Center of the Fight

California’s Clean Air Act waiver isn’t a new perk — it dates back decades and lets the state write its own vehicle pollution rules because of its historically severe smog problems, particularly in the Los Angeles basin. Because so many other states piggyback on California’s standard rather than write their own, revoking the waiver doesn’t just hit one state’s rulebook. It reaches into more than a dozen state capitols and the District of Columbia, all of which adopted California’s tougher numbers instead of the federal baseline.

The EPA’s argument is straightforward: one national standard removes the compliance headache of building cars to two different rulebooks, which the agency says drives down costs that get passed on to buyers. Critics counter that “unified” in this context means diluted, since the federal standard the administration wants to apply is the lower bar, not California’s.

Newsom and Becerra Draw the Line

Governor Newsom wasted no time framing the decision as a giveaway to industry at the expense of public health, accusing the administration of launching what he called an assault on clean air. Attorney General Becerra was just as direct, announcing California is prepared to take the fight to court to protect its regulatory authority.

California accused the administration of siding with corporate polluters over clean air — and vowed to defend its authority in court.

That legal fight will hinge on whether the EPA can unilaterally revoke a waiver California has held for decades, and the stakes go well beyond Sacramento given how many other states have hitched their own rules to California’s.

Automakers Already Picked a Side

This fight didn’t start on September 18. Earlier this year, several major automakers broke with the administration’s push to freeze Obama-era tailpipe and efficiency targets, instead striking a voluntary emissions pact directly with California. That deal effectively told Washington the industry was comfortable meeting California’s tougher numbers rather than the administration’s looser ones — a signal that undercuts the EPA’s argument that a single lower national standard is what the market actually wants.

The revocation announcement escalates that standoff, turning a dispute that automakers had partly settled on their own into a direct confrontation between the federal government and the nation’s most populous state.

Auto Market Risks and Stakes

With 13 states and D.C. following California’s lead, the practical reach of this decision covers more than a third of new-vehicle sales nationwide. If the revocation survives the coming legal challenge, automakers could be freed to build to a single, less stringent federal standard everywhere. If California and its allies win in court, the waiver stands and the current split — tougher rules in California-aligned states, looser rules everywhere else — continues.

Becerra’s office has signaled the lawsuit is coming, not hypothetical, and given how the administration has approached other California policy fights, this one is headed for the same place most of them do — a federal courtroom, with the waiver’s decades-long legal standing as the actual question a judge will have to answer.