InfoSearched
Published -
- May 1, 2020
- 3:16 pm
Remember the Emergency Money for the People’s Act (EMPA). That offered a potential $2,000 per month for those over 16 years old.
It was a clean, simple bill and looked great. Unfortunately Rep. Khanna just introduced a bill: the No Unconstitutional War with North Korea Act. And look, Korea is something to be concerned about: especially with Kim Jung Un’s uncertain health leaving a potential hegemonic power vacuum in the region. And keep in mind, the President can for 60 days go to war with a country via the War Powers Act.
This bill basically strips that power. And here’s what’s frustrating about that: This bill, cosponsored by Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, is a distract – we should be focusing on stimulus! Not this speculative drama.
How can Congress balance the immediate financial needs of citizens with national security concerns in its decision making?
In the midst of a global pandemic and economic crisis, the United States Congress is facing a critical decision that has the potential to shape the nation’s future for years to come. With President Donald Trump recently vetoing the $740 billion defense bill, and Congress facing a growing demand for a $2,000 stimulus check, the question must be asked: has Congress lost its mind in considering an increase in stimulus payments when a potential war with North Korea looms on the horizon?
On one hand, the proposed $2,000 stimulus check has been hailed by many as a lifeline to millions of American families suffering from job losses, business closures, and financial hardship brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic. The first round of stimulus payments issued earlier this year provided a temporary boost to the economy, but many argue that it was not enough to sustain individuals and families in need. A new stimulus package with an increased amount seems like the logical next step in providing the necessary aid to struggling Americans.
On the other hand, the possibility of a war with North Korea is a frightening reality that cannot be ignored. With tensions continuing to rise between the US and North Korea, there is a very real chance that military action could be taken in the near future. A war would not only result in devastating loss of life and resources, but it could also further destabilize an already fragile global economy.
The question remains: which is more important at this critical moment in US history? Should Congress prioritize the immediate financial needs of its citizens, or should it focus on ensuring national security and preventing a potential humanitarian crisis on the Korean peninsula?
There is no simple or easy answer to this question, as both issues are of vital importance. However, it is important for Congress to consider the long-term impact of their decisions and how they will affect not only the present, but also the future of the country. In considering these issues, Congress should prioritize finding solutions that address both the economic needs of its citizens and the security concerns of the nation.
It is also worth noting that the continued escalation of military tensions between the US and North Korea is not a problem that can be solved through a unilateral military response. Rather, diplomatic efforts and effective communication with all parties involved are critical in achieving a peaceful resolution.
In the end, the decision rests with Congress and the priorities it sets for the future of the country. As the world continues to grapple with the ongoing pandemic and economic crisis, it is more important than ever that Congress acts in the best interest of the American people and the world at large. It is time for Congress to demonstrate responsible leadership, a willingness to prioritize difficult decisions, and a commitment to pursuing peaceful solutions to complex problems. Only through such actions can Congress restore faith in its ability to lead and guide the nation forward through these challenging times.
